And just how well is this going to work?
Aug. 10th, 2006 04:49 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
According to CNN International, British police say they have disrupted an apparent plot to blow up planes in mid-flight. Heathrow was reportedly closed, though it's open now. New air travel security measures mean that no hand luggage aside from an extraordinarily limited set of items will be allowed on planes from UK airports.
If the carry-on limitations are any indication, it must be one hell of a plot, and one that is believed to still pose profound risk. Yes, indeed, in the bit of time I've been writing this, the banner has been changed to read, "Plot to blow up aircraft flying from UK was 'intended to be mass murder on an unimaginable scale,' police spokesman says."
CNN reports that Britain's transportation secretary Alexander "said the measures would be kept under review and would only be in place for as long as necessary. He said that he recognized that the measures meant that airline passengers would face immensely difficult circumstances."
No shit.
I'm trying to imagine any flight, let alone a transatlantic one, without a book to read. Having to check both my laptop and my CPAP equipment, or leave them at home. Not traveling with any jewelry other than what I'm wearing. No little PEZ Boy MP3 player, no inflatable neck pillow. Checking my purse, being allowed only a pocket-sized bag with ID/Passport, cash, credit cards, and essential prescription medications needed in flight...so long as they aren't liquid, or are somehow verified as authentic, and similar restrictions on the incredibly short list of allowed items...I'm not sure flying would be a realistic choice for me at this time. Work demands du jour mean accepting increased risks affecting my computer equipment and the time I have available to work on it are a really bad idea.
Fortunately, I'm not heading for an airport for another 11 days. There's a bit of time to see how this settles out, what if any security changes TSA decides upon during that time. So far, they've only prohibited liquids, gels, lotions, and similar items from carry-on baggage. I can put my toothpaste in my checked bag....
Yes, I realize these are small matters compared to any loss of life in deliberately-executed terrorist actions, let alone "mass murder on an unimaginable scale." But the travel disruptions that occur because of this particular set of security measures are going to be profound and then some. It's going to directly affect the world, and my personal world as well. We'll all find out how over the coming days and weeks.
Onward.
If the carry-on limitations are any indication, it must be one hell of a plot, and one that is believed to still pose profound risk. Yes, indeed, in the bit of time I've been writing this, the banner has been changed to read, "Plot to blow up aircraft flying from UK was 'intended to be mass murder on an unimaginable scale,' police spokesman says."
CNN reports that Britain's transportation secretary Alexander "said the measures would be kept under review and would only be in place for as long as necessary. He said that he recognized that the measures meant that airline passengers would face immensely difficult circumstances."
No shit.
I'm trying to imagine any flight, let alone a transatlantic one, without a book to read. Having to check both my laptop and my CPAP equipment, or leave them at home. Not traveling with any jewelry other than what I'm wearing. No little PEZ Boy MP3 player, no inflatable neck pillow. Checking my purse, being allowed only a pocket-sized bag with ID/Passport, cash, credit cards, and essential prescription medications needed in flight...so long as they aren't liquid, or are somehow verified as authentic, and similar restrictions on the incredibly short list of allowed items...I'm not sure flying would be a realistic choice for me at this time. Work demands du jour mean accepting increased risks affecting my computer equipment and the time I have available to work on it are a really bad idea.
Fortunately, I'm not heading for an airport for another 11 days. There's a bit of time to see how this settles out, what if any security changes TSA decides upon during that time. So far, they've only prohibited liquids, gels, lotions, and similar items from carry-on baggage. I can put my toothpaste in my checked bag....
Yes, I realize these are small matters compared to any loss of life in deliberately-executed terrorist actions, let alone "mass murder on an unimaginable scale." But the travel disruptions that occur because of this particular set of security measures are going to be profound and then some. It's going to directly affect the world, and my personal world as well. We'll all find out how over the coming days and weeks.
Onward.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 09:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 09:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 10:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 10:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 09:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 09:51 am (UTC)Those of us who live Across The Big Sea Water have just had our travel plans complicated big time. And since Peter and I have had a "travel with carry-on only to the US" policy running for some time now...things get more complicated yet. (eyeroll)
We'll see how this all settles out, as you say...
no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 10:26 am (UTC)Et cetera. The ripples from this one look more the size of surfing waves. I read that normally 186,000 people travel through Heathrow everyday. That's a lot of disruption, a lot of complication.
Here's hoping it settles down, and quickly, too. Fingers crossed all continues to work out and our paths soon cross at the Space Port Lounge and Underbelly Bar (yes, it's part of L.A.con IV)!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 10:14 am (UTC)I can imagine someone will find an excuse to restrict us even further for the sake of safety, but the airline industry is going to tank again if these are going to be instituted. Too much business travel, and pretty much a guarantee licensing of theft.
How will this affect people who need breathing apparatus? Yikes! What a nightmare!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 10:40 am (UTC)Unfortunately, the idea that God rewards brutal murderers has gained widespread popularity among Muslims; the people who hold this view are definitely a minority, but neither are they just a tiny handful of lunatics. Getting killed isn't a deterrent to them, because they think they'll just collect their reward that much more quickly if they die. So Al Qaeda has a supply of willing murderers, and of people willing to abet murder to varying degrees.
On the other side of the ledger, it's certain that the US and UK governments will use the latest threat as an excuse for more illegal actions and more attacks on our liberties. The timing is very convenient for Bush, with elections coming up in a few months. (For those who can't read, let me add: I did not say this is a Bush plot. I said "The timing is very convenient for Bush.")
No matter how it works out, we lose.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 11:14 am (UTC)If this had happened a year ago this week, imagine the post-Interaction chaos!
The new restrictions don't sound all that bad (I mean, I can always buy new toothpaste when I arrive somewhere), but I still don't like the idea of checking anything that could be stolen (medicines, laptops, cameras, et.c.).
no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 11:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 01:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 05:35 pm (UTC)I'm in the the UK at the moment ...
Date: 2006-08-10 11:14 am (UTC)First, I'm very glad *NOT* to be flying back to the US this week.
I'm torn between saying this is overblown, saying the UK Airports have been caught with their pants down, and saying I told you so (stop blindly backing Israel, get the hell out of the Mideast, and frankly stop trying to be den-mommy to the world). This last tirade applies to both the US and UK.
When I was at the hotel from 07:00 when I woke up to when I left at 08:00 to go to the office, this was basically the only story on the television news.
It sounds like part of the plot was to use liquid explosives. Which is why they are requiring a traveling passenger to taste baby food / liquid fluids.
The UK airports don't have the explosive sniffing technology that I have seen in the US and certainly nothing like the blown air machine (passenger essentially goes through a wind tunnel) that I have seen at Logan. Hence my comment about being caught with their pants down.
The previous security (post 9/11 until yesterday) was pretty much a joke - security theatre. You are going to allow dental floss and coat hangers, but not knitting needles or nail clippers? Give me a break!
Also laptops (and most LCD based devices) are a big risk. Not only can you hide a lot of stuff inside, but the LCD screens pretty much block a lot of the security screening. Which is why they usually ask you to take camcorders, dvd-players, and GPS devices out of the luggage too. Or at least they should. So, depending on how your laptop is configured, I suspect you could pop the battery, tape a razor blade inside, and stick the battery back in. Or better yet, take out the CD/DVD drive, use the weight saving dummy panel that a lot of computers come with and stick some "tools" in there. You could probably even talk yourself out of that one if you get caught.
Now, I'm not sure how long this is going to last. It also appears it is only for flights from the UK. I'm sure that the airport stores are not going to be happy about not selling books or food to bring on board. It is also interesting to think about what all US Government Employees carrying secret documents on them are going to do. People from Lincoln Labs et. al. regularly travel with secret documents. And you are not allowed to check them. IIRC, secret can be mailed (in double envleopes) but top secret and above must be hand carried. I can see a lot of people stopping by the embassy to put things in the "pouch". Not.
I'm scheduled to fly back to the USA next Friday 18 August. One of the first things I did this morning was book a Eurostar ticket from London to Paris, and a Delta (Air France) Flight from Paris to Boston for next Friday. If the situation in the UK hasn't improved by next Thursday, I'm not flying out of here. While I'd be willing to have everything searched and not take any liquids / unknown substances on board, I'm not happy about needing to check my laptop (and cell phones), but I'm even less happy about not being able to take reading material / work on the plane with me.
Re: I'm in the the UK at the moment ...
Date: 2006-08-10 11:28 am (UTC)I'm staying at the Hilton attached to Heathrow Terminal 4.
Last night there seemed to be more flights cancelled than usual. Maybe that is just coincidence. But, there were a lot of people stuck at the airport and hotels.
Also, in order to catch the bus to Ashford where Stratus is located, I have to walk thru T4. Which I did at about 8 AM this morning. While the terminal had longer check in lines, I didn't notice any of the additional security that was mentioned of checking IDs at the doors to the terminals and only letting ticketed passengers in. (I was proactive and took my US Passport with me in my shirt bocket today. I sometimes live in the hotel safe, my luggage, or even my briefcase.)
Delta et. al. say this extra security is only for flights from the UK at this point. Not even to the UK.
And yes, I'm confirmed in Business Class on both my flights next week (the one from the UK and the one from Paris). I'm also booked in First on Eurostar. If checkin is going to be a zoo, I'm going to make it go as smothly as possible for myself.
Re: I'm in the the UK at the moment ...
Date: 2006-08-10 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 11:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 12:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 01:21 pm (UTC)I have no idea if airlines are still allowed to give out newspapers. I assume they would be much in the same way as they are still being allowed to serve food and drink on the planes.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 12:32 pm (UTC)Indeed. Stephen and I have been watching the news the last few hours just hoping that once the security people think that the jittery public is reassured, they will let up on some of these restrictions. We leave for the US next Thursday and a 16+-hour flight without any diversion whatsoever is not something we want to contemplate even remotely.
Ironically, I was debating anyway whether to put my laptop in my checked baggage for the first time given my problems with carrying/lugging anything right now. However, I was also planning to increase my carry-on items in other ways (soft neck brace, another pillow, a reading stand). We're hoping that some reason will have prevailed by next week. I don't envy anybody in medias travel right now anywhere in Europe.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 12:37 pm (UTC)It's about god damned time somebody started paying attention to this glaring danger. I'm pretty sure books and magazines are not going to be forever banned as carry-on. I hope a lot of other stuff is, though.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 01:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 01:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 01:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 01:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 06:37 am (UTC)Virtually any liquid-container is a potential threat...
no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 01:20 pm (UTC)How on earth am I supposed to fly anywhere!
Oh foo, the paranoia seems to be spreading ...
Date: 2006-08-10 01:30 pm (UTC)Effective today, the TSA has informed Northwest that travelers are not allowed to transport any liquids, gels, lotions or similar items in their carry-on luggage. This includes items such as beverages, hairspray, toothpaste and shampoo. Customers are advised to transport these items in their checked luggage. The TSA will remove these items from customers' carry-on luggage at airport security checkpoints. These items must now be placed in checked luggage or they will be discarded.
As a result, the airline is suggesting that customers consider checking all of their luggage, in an effort to minimize delays at airport security checkpoints.
Northwest is also encouraging customers to allow additional time before their flight. Customers traveling domestically are encouraged to arrive two hours prior to departure, while those flying to international destinations are encouraged to arrive three hours prior to departure.
As additional information on this new TSA security requirement becomes available, it will be posted on the TSA's Web site at www.tsa.gov, and Northwest will post information to its Web site at www.nwa.com.
Re: Oh foo, the paranoia seems to be spreading ...
Date: 2006-08-10 03:40 pm (UTC)I haven't heard about "purse restrictions" hitting the states yet.
Re: Oh foo, the paranoia seems to be spreading ...
Date: 2006-08-10 04:36 pm (UTC)The only present "risk" factor I see regarding the electronics question is the possibility of the regulations changing between my arrival (wherever) and my return home. Having something happen to my laptop on the way home is much less of a problem for me at this time. If I've backed up data offsite somehow, that is. The notion of entrusting both my laptop *and* my USB flash drives to checked luggage would be too much, which is why I'm glad I'm not trying to fly out of the UK right now. But I believe there are online backup options available, or even remembering how to park files at my website as a backup while I'm traveling is probably something I should make time for.
(I have seven documents with deadlines hitting during my trip west, and an eighth with a deadline the day I return home. If I can't work while I'm in LA, I can't go to LA.)
For those of you who were planning to join the "Mile High Club" this week
no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 05:44 pm (UTC)Of course, that doesn't touch the problem of luggage...
In the meantime, most of the "precautions" being undertaken are, I'm afraid, as usual, more designed to demonstrate that the authorities are "doing something" than anything else.
Case in point: Ron Rosenbaum, local talk jock, showed up an hour early for his flight to Vegas, as is his wont. "Mr. Rosenbaum," the registration clerk informed him, "you've been randomly selected to be the passenger thoroughly searched for this flight, but the TSA guys aren't ready for you -- could you come back in an hour?"
What's particularly revolting is that the TSA folks have an articulable reason why they do it just that way.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-10 09:49 pm (UTC)Even being captured, the terrorist organization has a somewhat desired effect, not the one they wanted, but I am sure they are happy with the ensuing chaos.
Damn, where were those transporters we were promised?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-13 06:12 am (UTC)Being his usual helpful self, Marc sent her the sailing schedule for the Queen Mary.
And meanwhile, when we drove past the Pentagon a couple of hours ago, there wasn't even a normal Saturday-night's worth of cars in the parking lot ... things were clearly quiet there.
I'm tired of so much security as theatre performances put on by the TSA and those who've adopted their perspective (and taken their money).
This plan was broken up by investigative police work -- and it seems to me that that's where the USA and other countries can be best spending their dollars, not on attempting to stop terrorist activities by luck, stupidities, or bluster when it's close to too late.
The chemicals experts
Date: 2006-08-14 02:54 am (UTC)Just sayiing
(Erik joins the list of those I know who I say to, "You did THAT, got to WHAT age and still have all 10 fingers. Kewl.")